Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 1999 07:56:01 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Okay, somebody help me out here.
I don't seem to see the problem with KSAM/3000 (CM) and Y2K. After all,
based on my experience, I have never seen anything in KSAM/3000 that was
truly date sensitive - other than user data. Also, internally HP has
several "critical" applications that use KSAM/3000 files - and these
were not moved to "nm" KSAM during our Y2K remediation. The reasons are
numerous (including a proprietary non-KSAM read procudure against these
KSAM files). The fact remains that in our testing, even using future
dates, we never had a problem with the actual KSAM/3000 files.
Glenn
--
______________
| Navigators | Under contract to Hewlett-Packard ISG (Greeley, CO)
| |) |
| | ) | Glenn J. Koster, Sr. [log in to unmask]
| | ) | Managed Business Solutions http://www.mbsnav.com
| | ) | 214 S. College, Suite 201 At HP: (970) 350-5337
| |---- | Fort Collins, CO 80524 At MBS: (970) 224-1016
| ============ |
| \__________/ |
| of Change | aka: [log in to unmask]
|______________| home: http://members.aol.com/MichiTex
|
|
|