HP3000-L Archives

April 1999, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Glenn J. Koster, Sr." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 22 Apr 1999 07:56:01 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Okay, somebody help me out here.

I don't seem to see the problem with KSAM/3000 (CM) and Y2K.  After all,
based on my experience, I have never seen anything in KSAM/3000 that was
truly date sensitive - other than user data.  Also, internally HP has
several "critical" applications that use KSAM/3000 files - and these
were not moved to "nm" KSAM during our Y2K remediation.  The reasons are
numerous (including a proprietary non-KSAM read procudure against these
KSAM files).  The fact remains that in our testing, even using future
dates, we never had a problem with the actual KSAM/3000 files.

Glenn
--
 ______________
|  Navigators  | Under contract to Hewlett-Packard ISG (Greeley, CO)
|     |)       |
|     | )      | Glenn J. Koster, Sr.             [log in to unmask]
|     |  )     | Managed Business Solutions    http://www.mbsnav.com
|     |   )    | 214 S. College, Suite 201     At HP: (970) 350-5337
|     |----    | Fort Collins, CO  80524      At MBS: (970) 224-1016
| ============ |
| \__________/ |
|   of Change  | aka:  [log in to unmask]
|______________| home: http://members.aol.com/MichiTex

ATOM RSS1 RSS2