HP3000-L Archives

April 1999, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jagdish Damania <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jagdish Damania <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Apr 1999 09:36:47 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
Hi Jay

From your e-mail it is not clear that you are doing Y2K testing for
just set of independant programs or it is application software.

If it is application software, then check for how year and months are
defined. In many financial system Fiscal year 2000 starts on Oct 1999.
Based on this information, you may want do testing for year-end for
1999 Oct.

Jagdish


> From:   Roy Buzdor [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent:   Thursday, 15 April, 1999 11:10 AM
> To:     [log in to unmask]
> Subject:        Re: What dates to use for testing of
> Y2K-compliance?
>
> Jay Willis wrote:
>
> > I am in the process of testing my programs for
> > Y2K-compliance and was wondering what dates are
> being
> > used to test against. This is the list of dates
> that
> > I have come up with:
> >
> > 12/31/99...............last date of this millenium
> > 01/01/2000...........first date of the next
> millenium
> > 01/02/2000...........2nd date of the next
> millenium
>
> I know that this has been argued over and over, but
> technically, the AD dating scheme began with the
> year
> *1*, there was no year *0*, so while 1/1/2000 is the
> first year starting with a "2", the millenium does
> not
> end until 12/31/2000, and the next one does not
> start
> until 1/1/2001 (hence the movie).
>
> (Or was this just a troll to catch those obsessive
> folk like me...if so, reel me in.)
>
> --
>
> Buz          (8
>
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+
> |  Knowledge is proud that it has learn'd so much;
>           |
> |  Wisdom is humble that it knows no more.
>           |
> |    -- William Cooper: _The Task VI_
>           |
> +---------------------------------------+----------------------+
> | This is official written notice:      | My real
> address is:  |
> |   Please remove me from your mailing  |   lnuslad
> dot dzvg41 |
> |   list.                               |    at eds
> dot com    |
> +---------------------------------------+----------------------+
>

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2