HP3000-L Archives

April 1999, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Roy Buzdor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Roy Buzdor <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Apr 1999 09:09:52 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Jay Willis wrote:

> I am in the process of testing my programs for
> Y2K-compliance and was wondering what dates are being
> used to test against. This is the list of dates that
> I have come up with:
>
> 12/31/99...............last date of this millenium
> 01/01/2000...........first date of the next millenium
> 01/02/2000...........2nd date of the next millenium

I know that this has been argued over and over, but
technically, the AD dating scheme began with the year
*1*, there was no year *0*, so while 1/1/2000 is the
first year starting with a "2", the millenium does not
end until 12/31/2000, and the next one does not start
until 1/1/2001 (hence the movie).

(Or was this just a troll to catch those obsessive
folk like me...if so, reel me in.)

--

Buz          (8

+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Knowledge is proud that it has learn'd so much;             |
|  Wisdom is humble that it knows no more.                     |
|    -- William Cooper: _The Task VI_                          |
+---------------------------------------+----------------------+
| This is official written notice:      | My real address is:  |
|   Please remove me from your mailing  |   lnuslad dot dzvg41 |
|   list.                               |    at eds dot com    |
+---------------------------------------+----------------------+

ATOM RSS1 RSS2