HP3000-L Archives

March 1999, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Courry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paul Courry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:24:51 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I doubt if HP is going to piss off it's customer base.

Even if HP has no record of a machine, usually due to age or a series of owners, then the WORST HP can do is charge for 19
months of support before putting your software back on support. How do I know this? Because with Y2K coming all the old
machines, the ones whose operating systems that haven't been upgraded since MPE/iX 3.0, are going to HP and purchasing
MPE/iX 5.5 patch 4; I've guided a number of companies through the process with HP.

Paul Courry


On Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:03:04 -0600, John Lee wrote:

>At 05:41 AM 3/23/99 -0800, Shawn Gordon wrote:
>>Check out http://www.hp.com/pressrel/mar99/19mar99.htm if you haven't
>>already seen.  This is sad for folks in my area because Abtech was a real
>>quality reseller, the support was top notch and the machines always looked
>>like new.
>
>
>We had a pretty good working relationship with them, and I agree with what
>Shawn says above.  But I always wondered where they obtained legally
>licensed hardware so inexpensively.
>
>Just a word of warning -  having dealt with HP and licenses as much as I
>have, those who purchased any systems without legal licenses or with
>altered firmware or whatever may find their systems unsupportable by HP.
>Plan ahead.
>
>John Lee
>Vaske Computer Solutions
>Minneapolis, MN
>>
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2