HP3000-L Archives

March 1999, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shawn Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Shawn Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Mar 1999 06:57:25 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
While my TimeWarp product competes with HourGlass, my experience with
HourGlass showed that it worked just fine with these standard functions.
The COBOL statement MOVE FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE simply calls HPGMTSECS.






Ted Johnson <[log in to unmask]> on 03/25/99 06:48:58 AM

Please respond to [log in to unmask]

To:   [log in to unmask]
cc:    (bcc: Shawn Gordon/IS/FHM/FHS)
Subject:  Hourglass




In regards to Year 2000 testing has anyone used Hourglass in conjunction
with the MOVE FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE routine in COBOL (POST85).  Did it
actually work correctly?

Thank you.
--
*************************************************
Ted Johnson                     [log in to unmask]
Information Systems
Wake Forest University          336-758-4374
Winston-Salem, NC 27109         336-758-7127 FAX

"Roundabout way often shortest path to correct
decision."              -- Chang Apana

ATOM RSS1 RSS2