Roy Buzdor wrote:
>
> Mike C. Whitener wrote:
> >
> > Could someone please tell me who started the
> > HP 3000 Outdated thread and repost the
> > information about the consultant's study
> > concerning this issue? It is very important.
>
> ==================================================================
> Just read the following statement and would be interested in
> hearing anyone's comments.
>
> "The HP 3000 is based on a 25-year old architecture with
> correspondingly dated performance. "

Didn't HP catch IBM with it's pants down when they came out with the
RISC architecture? Doesn't sound very outdated to me.

>
> To me this sounds like someone that does not know a HP 3000 for
> the great machine that it is!