HP3000-L Archives

March 1999, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
B T Vikram Kumar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
B T Vikram Kumar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:24:08 +0530
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Hi all,

Thanks for all the suggestions/ feedback received for the large
transaction enhancement. We will try to incorporate these, and hope to
come out with a solution soon.

Regards,
Vikram

---------------------------------------------------------
<< Currently CSY Database lab is considering an enhancement to increase
the
transaction size for dynamic t ransactions (ie, transactions with a
structure like DBXBEGIN - DBPUT/ DBDELETE/ DBUPDATE - DBXEND/ DBXUNDO).
And also to give some sort of user control over the transaction. One
feature, which is being planned to implement is that, to issue a warning

to user when transaction size reaches a pre-defined soft limit. once
this warning is issued, users can have two options. Option #1: User is
forced to commit or rollback (DBXEND/ DBXUNDO). Option #2: Don't force
anything, user may chose to rollback/ commit or ignore the message. If
it is ignored, ultimately the transaction size may exceed the maximum
possible value and get a stalled transaction (i.e. compulsory rollback
and process abort). What we are seeking is your prefernce of the above
two options, based on your valuable experince. Your feedback on this
will help the lab in deciding on an implementation strategy and coming
up with the solution.

---------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2