Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 16 Dec 1998 17:42:54 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I've seen this done before going one way. Reference files were needed on a
different box, so the root file and related master and details were restored to
the other box on a daily basis. But going back the other way... have the files
been touched at all on the production box? If so, I'd say no way. Unless you can
reconstruct a corrupt root file.
[log in to unmask] wrote:
> We have a test box and a production box. We run processes on the test box to
> offload them from the production box. A particular process requires 13-14
> hours on the production box to populate an 8-million record TurboImage
> dataset. The same job on the test box requires about the same amount of
> time. The benefit of running on the test box is that cpu processing time is
> not being consumed on the production box.
>
> If one was to back up the datafile (Image master and detail files) on the test
> box, is it safe to restore that file onto the production box? I don't know
> enough about how image databases and image root files work to say if this will
> cause problems.
>
> Your input is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
|
|
|