HP3000-L Archives

December 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 21 Dec 1998 21:32:03 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Hello Art:

I'm not sure about the validity of the suit. But it you are running FoxPro,
it certainly is possible that you have the millennium bug. You will have
to test each application individually.

My company, Communication Horizons, has an easy millennium fix for FoxPro
Windows, FoxPro DOS, and FoxBase+. All you do is specify the century rollover
year, and 2-digit years automatically default to the correct century.

You can find out more at http://www.y2kfox.com/y2kfox.htm.

Truly,

Maureen Weicher
Communication Horizons
mailto:[log in to unmask]


In article <[log in to unmask]>,
  Art H Bahrs <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi All :)
>
>     Has anyone heard about this one?  and if so... what is up?
>
>    The following is from yesterday's Edupage.
>
> MICROSOFT SUED OVER Y2K BUG IN DATABASE TOOLS
> Software developer Ruth H. Kaczmarek has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District
> Court against Microsoft, alleging that the company's FoxPro and Visual
> FoxPro database development tools were unable to process dates properly
> beyond Dec. 31, 1999.  The suit is believed to be one of the first against
> Microsoft alleging Y2K defects in its software.  (Bloomberg News/Seattle
> Post-Intelligencer 11 Dec 98)
>
>     Need to know as my boss is asking... since we use FoxPro here...
>
> Art "Confused as Usual hehehe" Bahrs
>
>

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

ATOM RSS1 RSS2