HP3000-L Archives

December 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Newman, Kevin:" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Newman, Kevin:
Date:
Mon, 21 Dec 1998 08:17:29 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Sometimes corporate/educational policies dictate what you buy, believe
me, I know.  We ended up with a Comcrap and everyone here wanted to get
an HP, but corporate dictated the policy, so what do you do?

Kevin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Whalen [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 1998 8:49 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: Another 3000 arrives
>
> Talk about a slap.  At least they could of bought a HP Netserver!!!
> --
> Tom Whalen
> Data Center Manager
> Community Health Care, Inc.
> [log in to unmask]
>                  > T h e  T r u t h  i s  O u t  T h e r e  <
> Wirt Atmar wrote in message ...
> >Bob Walker writes:
> >
> >> We just received the machine to host our new accounting system
> which
> >>  uses SQLServer on NT.
> >>
> >>  The logo on the front of the box reads:
> >>     'Compaq Proliant 3000'.
> >>
> >>  We all had a good laugh.
> >>  We'll try to put it beside the 'other' 3000 in the room.
> >
> >Bob,
> >
> >You'll have to go out and quickly buy an IBM Netfinity 3000 Server to
> put
> next
> >to your Compaq Proliant 3000, Hewlett-Packard 3000, and even perhaps
> an IBM
> >WheelWriter 3000.
> >
> >Who says the "3000" is dead?
> >
> >Wirt Atmar
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2