Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 17 Dec 1998 15:01:16 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi,
> This should be plain text. Please let me know if it still has attachments.
This one has no attachments.
I didn't comment on the first one, but I use a "steam powered" mail
reader (elm), which doesn't handle them well at all :)
> not fond of html messages and direct email responses are to be expected -
I don't know to what extent they're expected. Usually, if I'm answering
a question for someone, I'll do a "group reply", which (for me) sends
the reply to the sender *and* the group...because (1) someone else is
probably interested in the same thing, and (2) it might save another
person the task of replying.
> therefore, placing anti-spam text in the return email address is not
> advisable.
It makes it harder for people to reply offline to you. At least four
times, I've just given up when I've belatedly noticed
that I mailed a response to [log in to unmask]
If you're asking for help, don't add a barrier to getting the answer :)
> Are there any other preferences that I should be aware of?
Well, we tend to prefer MPE over Unix :)
--
Stan Sieler [log in to unmask]
http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html
|
|
|