Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Shah, Roshan (Windsor, HQ) |
Date: | Thu, 19 Nov 1998 15:24:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Okay to Use for
1) Use for Company ("Client's" Purpose is okay )
2) Use for Skill Enhancement & Self Development is Okay
3) Use for Sending mails to overseas Parents is Okay
4) Use for All Communications to Employer ( "The Consulting Firm" ) is
okay
Not Okay
1) Purposeful harrassment of employee
2) Threats / Spam
3) For sending Junk "Humor" and Political Articles as a massmail to many
doing a BCC in or outside a
Company.
4) Sending Company's information / software source outside as attachment
without Permission
from Manager
It should be seen checked what % of the Outgoing Mail is within the
Company and what % is outside.
There cannot be a lot of Outside mail if the Employee does not meet the
targets. To share Technical Knowledge with Discussion Lists is a
question which should differ from company to company
Roshan
>----------
>From: Simpkins, Terry[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 2:14 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: E-mail privacy
>
>Since I got such fast (and useful) help on the last previous problem of the
>day,
>I think I'll push my luck.
>
>My Human Resources department has asked for my input on a policy statement
>regarding privacy of e-mail within our company. Being the "less government
>is better
>government" type that I am, I created a very broad couple of statements that
>said
>something like this:
>
>E-mail should be thought of as being as private as things in a locked file
>cabinet.
>The company reserves the right to examine it like any other company property
>if needed.
>It takes the approval of the VP - HR and Director of ISIT to get into
>someones e-mail, and
>will only be done for "good cause".
>
>I purposefully avoided the issue of "personal use", etc. Since I didn't want
>to even think
>about being in the "email police" business. Well you guessed it, there are
>some people
>who are being "unreasonable" and are sending things that are not very
>appropriate.
>Anyone have examples of a policy they think is pretty good and that they are
>will to share?
>
>*******************************
>Terry W. Simpkins
>Director ISIT
>Lucas Control Systems
>[log in to unmask]
>*******************************
>
|
|
|