HP3000-L Archives

November 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andreas Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:20:05 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
better: PP6 which includes the patch for the DBUTIL problem.

By the way, we installed PP5 plus this patch MPEKXJ3A, and do not have any
problem on our big production system.

Best regards, Andreas Schmidt, CSC, Germany





[log in to unmask] on 11/18/98 06:58:38 PM

Please respond to [log in to unmask]

To:   [log in to unmask]
cc:    (bcc: Andreas Schmidt/HI/CSC)
Subject:  Re: 6.0 vs PP5




Rick,

We have installed MPE 5.5 powerpatch 5, and got trouble with dbutil, there
is a bug in the erase option, so you need to get a reactive patch for that.
With MPE 6.0 we have no experience so i can not say anything about that.
So watch out for MPE 5.5 powerpatch 5.

Good luck desiding what to do,

Jan Gerrit Kootstra
Rick Clark heeft geschreven in bericht ...
>Ok. I just received the MPE iX v 6.0 tape. I am scheduled to install
>Power Patch 5 for 5.5 this weekend. My question is this, should I forgoe
>the Power Patch and go ahead and install the new version of the
>operating system???
>
>A side note.... in regards to all my questions on the 9000 system.
>Thanks to everyone who responded. I attempted to reply to all, but I was
>overwhelmed. I am really looking forward to the challenge.
>
>
>Rick 'bring it on!' Clark
>Senior Analyst
>WW&R
>Cleveland, Ohio
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2