HP3000-L Archives

November 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jan Gerrit Kootstra <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jan Gerrit Kootstra <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Nov 1998 07:18:08 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Jon,


Sorry to disagree with you, but some sites received the 'dirty' powerpatch
5, we did too.


Jan Gerrit Kootstra


Jon Cohen heeft geschreven in bericht <[log in to unmask]>...
>5.5 PP 5 was the Powerpatch that was placed on production hold.
>If you want to stay on 5.5, either
>
>   o  Install Powerpatch 6, or
>   o  Install the reactive patch MPEKXJ3 after you've installed PP5.
>
>Preliminary returns on 6.0 have been very good.  As many here have
>mentioned, if you've got the time, 6.0 may be the better answer.  At
>least that's my personal opinion.
>
>Jon Cohen
>Commercial Systems Division
>Hewlett-Packard
>
>
>Rick Clark wrote in message ...
>>Ok. I just received the MPE iX v 6.0 tape. I am scheduled to install
>>Power Patch 5 for 5.5 this weekend. My question is this, should I forgoe
>>the Power Patch and go ahead and install the new version of the
>>operating system???
>>
>>A side note.... in regards to all my questions on the 9000 system.
>>Thanks to everyone who responded. I attempted to reply to all, but I was
>>overwhelmed. I am really looking forward to the challenge.
>>
>>
>>Rick 'bring it on!' Clark
>>Senior Analyst
>>WW&R
>>Cleveland, Ohio
>>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2