HP3000-L Archives

November 1998, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Nov 1998 15:10:41 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In article <[log in to unmask]>, Dennis Handly
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>Walter Murray ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>: The compiler is producing this ANSI-required diagnostic because,
>: strictly speaking, C does not approve of mixing function pointers
>: with other pointers, even pointers-to-void.
>: Walter Murray
>
>In the strict ANSI C++ Standard you can't even do the casts that Walter
>mentions.
>Pointers to functions can't be converted to pointers to objects at all!
>Several ARM rules were removed.
>
>You must indirectly cast them to an integral type and then to the other.

This whole thread has got to represent the most eloquent argument I have
ever seen.

For COBOL :-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2