HP3000-L Archives

October 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Windows 2000
From:
Steve BARRETT <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve BARRETT <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Oct 1998 10:17:00 +0000
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines) 
Glenn wrote:

Lars wrote:

> But a handy shortcut for the "Windows 2000" name might be Win 00.

Is that like "Win nothing"?  As in what we all get if Micro$oft takes
over all of the markets that they want?

Glenn
--

--------------------Reply Separator--------------------

Maybe we are missing the obvious point of "Windows 2000".  It's
probably just Microsoft making its OS naming convention Y2K compliant
so it can continue the cycle of reinventing the OS into the next
millenium.  As pointed out above, it just doesn't work with 2 digit
years.

Steve Barrett

ATOM RSS1 RSS2