Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:53:49 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Curtis Larsen writes:
>
> Can someone very POSIX-porting-knowledgeable please indicate what
> things CAN'T be ported to an MPE/iX system?
> I mean -- in general -- what problems would I face in trying to
> re-compile some bit of POSIX/GNU C source code on a MPE/iX 5.5
> system?
GNU stuff is usually very easy to port to MPE, once you get the configure
script working properly. Lars Appel has a configure script generator you can
use (the location escapes me, unfortunately), or you can tweak the script
manually as described at:
http://www.cccd.edu/~markb/porting.html
The MPE select() function doesn't work against terminal file descriptors, and
other terminal I/O support is lacking. That's not to say that porting
terminal-intensive applications is impossible, but rather it may be fairly
difficult and unpleasant.
> (And even if you could technically port something, what possible
> system performance issues would preclude you from doing so?
> or "Why We Don't Run Quake Servers under MPE")
The fork() function suffers from TERRIBLE performance. Network server
daemons that fork() a child to handle each incoming socket connection will be
SLOW. Servers that use a pre-forked child pool (like Apache) will offer much
better performance.
--
Mark Bixby E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Coast Community College Dist. Web: http://www.cccd.edu/~markb/
District Information Services 1370 Adams Ave, Costa Mesa, CA, USA 92626-5429
Technical Support Voice: +1 714 438-4647
"You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish." - tunefs(1M)
|
|
|