HP3000-L Archives

October 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Shah, Roshan (Windsor, HQ)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Shah, Roshan (Windsor, HQ)
Date:
Wed, 21 Oct 1998 14:19:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Agree!!!

Whey do they purchase Windows 98 when it crashed at the hands of the
Lord - GATES ??? Huh!!! My PC crashes / memory faults, etc... etc..at
Home.. But HP3K is very stable at work ;-)))

CW needs to look at HP3K at a different angle.

Roshan
>----------
>From:  Joe Geiser[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent:  Wednesday, October 21, 1998 2:12 PM
>To:    [log in to unmask]
>Subject:       Re: Please help decipher Computerworld
>
>Alfredo says quite rightly, that:
>
>> Computerworld mentions HP's "range of Unix and Intel Corp.
>> servers" but
>> fails to mention "MPE" and "HP3000" (both products form HP's
>> most reliable
>> business-critical combination of software and hardware systems).
>
>Yes, they do fail to mention it don't they?  I guess they fired the
>"reporter" that used to cover the 3000 (what's the old misquoter's name
>again?)...
>
>Also, again - if it's not Unix or NT, which are the buzzwords, press is hard
>to come by, especially in some rags, like CW!
>
>I still say, everyone should stand up, cancel their subscriptions to this
>publication, until their journalistic standards are raised to be factual.
>Heck, even [Mis]InfoWorld does a better job!
>
>Joe (who wonders why anyone would pay for CW is beyond my comprehension)
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2