Please forgive me if you got the quoted article below -- I've cancelled
it because the Followup-To: header was accidentally removed somehow..
_this_ post should have the correct followup-to set.
ugh.
Rich
[log in to unmask] (Richard J. Rauenzahn) writes:
>The 10 or so groups crossposted above are probably not interested in
>this (especially ca.unix and comp.unix.*). I've set this followup to be
>only comp.sys.hp.hpux. I hope anyone else perpetuating this thread will
>do the same...
>
>Rich
--
Rich Rauenzahn [log in to unmask] Hewlett-Packard Company
Technical Consultant | I speak for me, | 19055 Pruneridge Ave.
Development Alliances Lab| *not* HP | MS 46TU2
IASD / Enterprise Systems Group +--------------+---- Cupertino, CA 95014