Tim Ericson wrote:

> Allan Chalmers wrote:
> > How about letting Donna look them over and then send the rest to
> > Interex?   Tim, being second, what do you say?
>
> Well, my greedy, gotta-have-a-full-library side says gimme, gimme,
> gimme;

now, let's play nice :-)

> but my what's-really-best-for-the-user's-group side wins out

ahh, that's better :-)

> and would like to see them go to Interex; hopefully with Interex
> somehow creating scanned and webified (and maybe OCRed?) versions of
> the major articles from them.

i'd sure like to see that happen.

> From what Michael Doyle said earlier,
> I don't know how much they'll get used, though!  I know I'd bookmark
> such a site, and would refer to it a few times per year - I guess
> it's a question of cost effectiveness.

<sigh> does it always have to be an issue of money?i do like what mark
suggested -- to split up the work amongst
the list and have us put the bigger articles into electronic
form (which i'm sure will generate a thread of monsterous
proportions about just how to do this :-).  it would be neat
(or is that 'cool'?) to be able to read eugene's old columns
again.  now that i've thoroughly dated myself, i'll shut up :-)       - d

--
Donna Garverick     Sr. System Programmer
925-210-6631        [log in to unmask]

>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<