Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Stigers, Greg ~ AND |
Date: | Thu, 13 Aug 1998 15:23:22 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Good point. This did come up off list, not that anyone else could know
that. My concern is in trying to enforce this now, in a shop with
multiple operators, where a 'log off' policy was not well enforced, by
man or machine. Then an operator, faced with admitting certain more
serious mistakes, could claim to have simply forgotten to logout.
Nevertheless, I will start pushing in this direction, as there seems to
be some benefit, and no harm in doing so.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Courry [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 1998 1:12 AM
> To: Stigers, Greg ~ AND; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: console operators and security
>
> One point NOT yet mentioned is the occasional need to trace a screwup
> back
> to a specific operator.
<snip>
|
|
|