Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 1 Jul 1998 16:13:00 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Here's part of what Greg Stigers had to say about the HP 3000 on an NT list, in
response to whether folks should adopt NT 5.0 when it first comes out. Good
show!
-Bob
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 17:04:05 -0400
From: "Stigers, Greg ~ AND" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Ouch; Should Users skip NT 5.0?
<snip>
I for one like pushing the envelope, and only wish I could dedicate more
time to this. I like to learn something new every day. But then, I am
lucky to work on one of the industry's most reliable mid-range systems,
the HP 3000 (which I can see in Network Neighborhood courtesy of SAMBA),
and bring a definite bias to what it is we do. I wouldn't want to run a
large enterprise on NT just yet, since things we take for granted on
large reliable servers like on line backup are just starting to become
available for it, but I look forward to working with it, just as soon as
possible.
Opinions are very much my own, but that should be obvious by now. insert
std disclaimers.
|
|
|