I'd also add that the next time (if there is one :-) I'd recommend naming
the set something like PROD and skip the "_SET".  It's repetitively
redundant over and over again.  :-)

Bill

At 05:21 PM 6/16/98 -0700, Stan Sieler wrote:
>Glen writes:
>
>> NEW SETUP.
>>
>> LDEV1      MEMBER1     MPEXL_SYSTEM_VOLUME_SET
>> LDEV2      MEMBER2     MPEXL_SYSTEM_VOLUME_SET
>> LDEV3      MEMBER3     MPEXL_SYSTEM_VOLUME_SET
>> LDEV5      MEMBER5     PROD_SET
>> LDEV11    MEMBER11   PROD_SET
>> LDEV12    MEMBER12   PROD_SET
>> LDEV13    MEMBER13   PROD_SET
>> LDEV14    MEMBER14   PROD_SET
>> LDEV15    MEMBER15   PROD_SET
>> LDEV16    MEMBER16   PROD_SET
>> LDEV17    MEMBER17   PROD_SET
>> LDEV18    MEMBER18   PROD_SET
>
>The only thing I'd recommend is that next time (if there is one :),
>I'd name the PROD_SET members something like PROD1, PROD2, ...
>there's little benefit (generally) in linking the volume name to
>an ldev, particularly since you could renumber the ldevs and the
>volume would still be found.
>
>
>--
>Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
>                                     http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html
>
>