HP3000-L Archives

June 1998, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
[log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 11 Jun 1998 12:54:24 -0600184_- <stuff regarding dat drives snipped>

> work don't read tapes created on other drives; and with HP doubling
> their after-hours rate from $900 to $1,800, we have46_11Jun199812:54:[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 11 Jun 1998 11:08:37 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
cc:Mail (42 lines)
Hi,

I think you have set the TZ ( time zone) variable incorrectly or
it is not set.

You can find a complete listing of TZ values in the COBOL manual under :
"function current-date".

According to the manual:

If TZ is not set, CURRENT-DATE assumes Eastern Standard Time (EST5EDT).



I hope this helps.

Michael

--------------------------------------
John writes :

This is my first posting, so bear with me, please.

I am using the FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE in a COBOL program and it works
fine.  It just gets the wrong date.  For today's date I get 5-28-98,
which was two weeks ago.

I vaguely remember that this comes from one of the system dates.  Can
anyone tell me which date it is and how to change it so that I will get
the correct.

The HP Response center talked me through this about 6 months.  Following
their instructions I changed the date.  Then the function worked fine,
but other things on the system went south, like OCS schedules, etc.

Thanks.

John Bleazard
Boeing Computer Services
Wichita, KS
(316)526-2365

ATOM RSS1 RSS2