Mark Bixby wrote:
> Yes, sh works in batch.
good :-)
> I believe the patch Chris is referring to is MPEJX51B; rather than just
> strictly a sh problem, this was a more general bytestream->spoolfile problem.
yes, you're right and we do have this patch. thanks everyone! - d
--
Donna Garverick Sr. System Programmer
925-210-6631 [log in to unmask]
>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<<