HP3000-L Archives

April 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tony Furnivall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tony Furnivall <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Apr 1998 15:34:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi there performance gurus!

I'm posting this for a colleague, and disclaim ANY understanding of the
arcane issues involved!
I'd be interested in knowing the following:

How many folks are using PERFVIEW to gather historical performance data on
their MPE/iX boxes?

Conversely how many are using something else?

What factors influenced the decision one way or the other?

Have users of PERFVIEW noticed any problems with differences between Un*x
and NT clients for displaying historical data?

What is the operational impact on having to FTP data files from MPE/iX to
some other platform for analysis?

If you can include the PERFVIEW in the subject line, I'll gather the
(relevant!) responses and post a summary. TIA
Tony

ATOM RSS1 RSS2