Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Apr 1998 10:22:11 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sletten Kenneth W wrote:
<discussion snipped>
> ========================================
> Ability to do FIND FIELDA = FIELDB in IMAGE QUERY.
> ========================================
<history snipped>
> QUESTION SECTION:
<discussion snipped>
> QUESTION: Is limiting this feature to compatible datatypes
> acceptable ?? If not, why not ??
Compatible data-types would be adaquate.
> QUESTION: Is limiting this feature to one database O.K. ??
Limiting to one datadase is OK.
> QUESTION: Is limiting this feature to one dataSET O.K. ??
Definitely not. The ability to compare items in different datasets is
probably the most useful aspect of this concept.
> QUESTION: Is just "equal" all you need, or should this
> feature include some or all of the other "standard"
> comparison operators (<>, >, <, >=, <=) ??
> thanks,
I would certainly like to see all the operators, as well as booleans:
and, or, not.
|
|
|