HP3000-L Archives

April 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stigers, Greg ~ AND" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stigers, Greg ~ AND
Date:
Thu, 16 Apr 1998 18:22:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
So, can we safely say that by failing to follow the rules, one can break
any implementation of a technology that involves two or more components?
Whether it is drives on a PC or code on Mac or even, as hard as I find
this to believe, the 3K? I have seen a third party use other name brand
third party software in ways the 'crashed' our 3Ks. Before that, I only
saw one crash when it lost LDEV 1. Since then, I have read and heard
amazing things that could crash the 3K.

As to following the rules, one can say much about the reasonableness and
accessibility of those rules. On a better day, I could say something
witty about aberrant behavior on the part of one's spouse when
unreasonable and unknowable rules were violated...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2