Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 10 Apr 1998 13:38:13 -0400452_ISO-8859-1 We are in need of some troubleshooting assistance on our local area network at our facility in El Paso, Texas. If anyone has any recommendations or if you are a provider of such services, please contact me (preferably off-list). Thanks. Jim Phillips Manager of Information Systems E-Mail: [log in to unmask] Therm-O-Link, Inc. Phone: (330) 527-2124 P. O. Box 285 Fax: (330) 527-2123 Garrettsville, Ohio 4423153_10Apr199813:38: [log in to unmask] |
Date: | Wed, 8 Apr 1998 18:14:27 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
According to the HP Y2K white paper, 917 and 967 are Tested and 2000-Ready,
that means that H/W "will operate in a well-defined, predictable manner
when using dates beyond the year 2000, and will not result in errors
related to the year 2000 rollover."
By the way, 925, 935, and 949 are not tested.
2nd question should be answered by HP,
3rd question is answered by the above: no reasons not to do it.
Best regards, Andreas Schmidt, CSC, Germany
Juan Pineiro <[log in to unmask]> on 08/04/98 06:03:02 PM
Please respond to Juan Pineiro <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
cc: (bcc: Andreas Schmidt/HI/CSC)
Subject: HP917 and HP967 and Y2K
Anybody know off hand ....
1.Are these two systems Y2k compliant hardware?
2.Any plans for HP not to support these boxes in the near distant future?
3. Any reason why we would not be able to set the clock forward past 2000
and test?
TIA
|
|
|