 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 9 Apr 1998 18:30:47 -0700723_- Gavin writes: > What if :LISTF[ILE] let you do: > > :LISTFILE @,MYCOMMAND > > and then for each file matching the fileset(s)/SELEQ :LISTFILE would > internally execute: > > :MYCOMMAND filename > > Where "filename" is the fully qualified filename of the file selected > by :LISTFILE. then Stan: > Neat! > > Sure, you could sort of simulate it if we had CI file access functions, > but Gavin assumes that this mode would invoke MYCOMMAND as each > filename is derived, which provides quicker feedback/output/results > than doing a "LISTFILE,6" into a file and then post-processing it. [...]64_9Apr199818:30: [log in to unmask] |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Apr 1998 09:01:17 +0000 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
CHRISTIAN LHEUREUX@MOULINEX asked:
> I'm looking for a program named SCANPDIR, running on MPE/iX. I need both 4.0
> and 5.0 versions. Can someone help me ?
RAMUSAGE, which may be downloaded for free from http://www.allegro.com,
produces output like this:
RAMUSAGE [2.32] - LPS Toolbox [A.02b] (c) 1995 Lund Performance
Solutions
SERIES 968RX
MPE/iX 5.5
#CPUS: 1
Memory size: 128 MB (134,217,728 bytes; 32,768 logical pages)
Memory usage by "type" of Object Class:
Class #LogicalPages #MB % total
------------- ------------- --- -------
SYSTEM_CODE 4,451 17 13.6%
SYSTEM_DATA 18,766 73 57.3%
UNUSED 3,815 14 11.6%
TURBO_DATA 1 0 0.0%
USER_CODE 1,543 6 4.7%
USER_DATA 730 2 2.2%
USER_STACK 1,274 4 3.9%
USER_FILE 2,187 8 6.7%
Totals: 32,767 127 100.0%
"User" pages are 29.1% of memory (38 MB out of 128 MB)
If you added:
32 MB, you'd have 1.8 times as much "User" memory. ( 160 total MB) 64
MB, you'd have 2.7 times as much "User" memory. ( 192 total MB) 96
MB, you'd have 3.5 times as much "User" memory. ( 224 total MB)
128 MB, you'd have 4.4 times as much "User" memory. ( 256 total MB)
160 MB, you'd have 5.2 times as much "User" memory. ( 288 total MB)
192 MB, you'd have 6.1 times as much "User" memory. ( 320 total MB)
224 MB, you'd have 6.9 times as much "User" memory. ( 352 total MB)
256 MB, you'd have 7.7 times as much "User" memory. ( 384 total MB)
288 MB, you'd have 8.6 times as much "User" memory. ( 416 total MB)
320 MB, you'd have 9.4 times as much "User" memory. ( 448 total MB)
352 MB, you'd have 10.3 times as much "User" memory. ( 480 total MB)
384 MB, you'd have 11.1 times as much "User" memory. ( 512 total MB)
<plug>
This report is a small subset of the data provided by PAGES, one of the
utilities in the Toolboxes developed by Allegro Consultants and available
from Lund Performance Solutions. Lund Performance Solutions can be reached at
(541) 926-3800.
</plug>
---
Michael D. Hensley | mailto:[log in to unmask]
Allegro Consultants Inc. |
408/252-2330 | Visit scenic http://www.allegro.com
|
