HP3000-L Archives

March 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jan Gerrit Kootstra <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jan Gerrit Kootstra <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 06:17:03 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Dear Walter,


One reason I can think off, is the conversion to another platform in the
long run. At this moment the user wants some extra functionality, so some
extra routines need to be created, but a total recompilation to NM is to
time consuming (expensive in manhours).


Greetings,


Jan Gerrit.


Walter Murray heeft geschreven in bericht
<[log in to unmask]>...
>In a different thread, someone was asking for suggestions on how
>to create C subroutines in Compatibility Mode, because his application
>runs in CM.  This raises a question in my mind.  (I hope I'm not
>opening too big a can of worms.)
>
>What are the main reasons that applications are still running in
>Compatibility Mode under MPE/iX?
>
>I don't mean to imply that there aren't good reasons.  I can think
>of a number of possibilities, but what's the reality?
>
>If you still have applications running in CM, why?  Do you expect
>that they will ever be converted to NM?
>
>Walter Murray
>Hewlett-Packard
>Support Technology Lab

ATOM RSS1 RSS2