Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 1998 08:19:32 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
David A. Lethe wrote:
<snip>
>
> I'm curioius.... did they ever comment on such "minor" topics such as:
> -> SSA performance vs FC-AL & Parallel SCSI?
> -> SSA's ability to allow multiple drives to simultaneously do I/O
> across the same channel ... resulting in BETTER performance as drives
> are added??
> -> SSA's added RELIABILITY/AVAILABILITY over parallel-SCSI based
> subsystems.
David,
For my site and I would assume most other high-availability geared users
of the HP3000 (your main target for these drives I would assume), we
will not put our data on something HP has not OFFICIALLY blessed.
Period, regardless of how reliable, fast ect. your drives are!
--
****************************************
** **
** Chad Gilles **
** Sr. Software Analyst **
** ---------------------------------- **
** American United Life **
** One American Sq. **
** Indianapolis, IN 46206-0368 **
** ---------------------------------- **
** Ph. 317-263-1423 **
** Fx. 317-263-1956 **
** EM. [log in to unmask] **
** ---------------------------------- **
** **
** _/_/_/ _/ _/ **
** _/ _/ _/ **
** _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ **
** _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ **
**_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ **
** **
****************************************
|
|
|