Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 27 Mar 1998 08:22:14 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Sekular,
um.... I have used both Reflection (DOS & Windows) and Minisoft in a
previous life.... (Reflection is on my machine here at BCBSO :))
Minisoft did look different... and it did have trouble handling files
that had been downloaded or transferred in label format by
Reflection...but... I found that the Tech Support people at Minisoft were
much more helpful and available when I would call for help :) :)
I mean I was on a first name basis with Dell up at Minisoft Tech
Support! hehehe
Art "It's Friday!!! hehehe " Bahrs
From: [log in to unmask] on 03/26/98 09:30 PM
Please respond to [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
cc: (bcc: Art H Bahrs/BCBSO/TBG)
Subject: Re: Terminal Emulation
I use both REFLECTIONS and MINISOFT. Minisoft cannot hold a candle to
Reflections. For one the buffer size cant be increased in Minisoft or
at least not on the version I am on. And I have found that it has
problems when using labels on file transfers.....plus it just aint as
friendly....big buttons....looks ugly.
On Thu, 26 Mar 1998 11:19:37 -0500, Therm-O-Link
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Gary says:
>
>>Try www.minisoft.com. It isn't as elegant as Reflection, but it is a lo=
>t
>>cheaper.
>
>To which Ron replied:
>
>>... and a pain on performance!!!
>
>?
>
>Care to expound on that statement, Ron?
>
>I've used both Reflection and MiniSoft, and have found MiniSoft to be =
>
>able to do everything Reflection could do. I haven't noticed any =
>
>performance hit, either on the PC or the HP, so I'd like more =
>
>information.
>
>Jim Phillips Manager of Information Systems
>E-Mail: [log in to unmask] Therm-O-Link, Inc.
>Phone: (330) 527-2124 P. O. Box 285
> Fax: (330) 527-2123 Garrettsville, Ohio 44231
|
|
|