Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 26 Mar 1998 12:38:57 -0500 |
Content-Type: | Text/Plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In <[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] writes:
> > >Try www.minisoft.com. It isn't as elegant as Reflection, but it is a lo> t
> > >cheaper.
> >
> > To which Ron replied:
> >
> > >... and a pain on performance!!!
> >
> > Care to expound on that statement, Ron?
> >
> > I've used both Reflection and MiniSoft, and have found MiniSoft to be >
> > able to do everything Reflection could do. I haven't noticed any >
> > performance hit, either on the PC or the HP, so I'd like more >
> > information.
I can't speak for Ron, but having done some side-by-side comparisons; the
terminal emulation doesn't seem notably slower/faster in either - especially
since the latest versions of R1 have slowed down considerably (especially when
you enable hot-spots in 6.0 of R1) but I can state that if you do alot of
downloading, R1 has MS92 beat badly... file transfers I've done over VT
sessions consistently show R1's file transfer at 4-6 *times* faster than MS92s
(using both products latest host programs).
While I'd recommend MS92 on a price/performance basis for terminal emulation,
if you have to do alot of file transfers, you NEED R1.
-Chris Bartram
|
|
|