HP3000-L Archives

December 1997, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Dec 1997 18:14:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
> From: F. Alfredo Rego <[log in to unmask]>
> << A lot sniped about the Computer World article>>

>          Wait this one out, let other people wring out the bugs and wait
> for Version 5.1. Products produced under time pressure usually aren't as
> good as they should be.
>

> What do YOU think?

I think Bill Gates has a swelled head.  More to the point I would recommend
that people who want to switch be cautious for two reasons:

1.  The obvious, as stated above - NT will not be ready for the big
     time in the foreseeable future.

2.  MPE has most of the capability desired.  Switching systems to
    achieve bebulous goals has proved to be a chimera in many well
    documented cases.  Conversions are seldom rewarding and almost
    always over budget and time lines.

Now if only HP will realize this and market the 3000 hard and
effectively.

Hang in there, guys.  You have nothing to fear but fear itself!

WOW, did I say that? (well Ok, so it was borrowed).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2