HP3000-L Archives

November 1997, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe Geiser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Joe Geiser <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Nov 1997 10:17:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Ron,

>Companies that have been cavalier about Year 2000 work might take notice of
>the US government's attitude. There are bills being proposed now that would
>mandate that every company must report what its Year 2000 plans are, and
>well before the turn of the century. Government meddling and overkill,
>perhaps, but good medicine for some with their heads still stuck in the
>sand. During our recent looks at Year 2000 tools in the 3000 NewsWire, we
>were surprised to hear that there are still many firms that aren't
>addressing Year 2000. Given the high hit rate for health care among HP 3000
>sites, the following story might open some eyes.

This, from a government that's only 35% compliant itself (by it's own
admission during congressional hearings)...  This is absolutely ludicrous.

>From Computerworld:

I need not comment here <grrr>

Joe

ATOM RSS1 RSS2