Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 26 Nov 1997 11:13:45 -0800501_- I wrote: > Me too. Although it seems to be better today. Anyone else seing this? I tried to be cute and post this to the list *twice* but listserv was too smart for me :-) "Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it appears to have already been distributed to the HP3000-L list. That is, a message with identical text (but possibly with different mail headers) has been posted to the list recently, either by you or by someone else." [...]39_26Nov199711:13: [log in to unmask] |
Date: | Tue, 25 Nov 1997 18:37:02 -0500 |
Content-Type: | Text/Plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In <[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] writes:
> Bill wrote:
>
> > I am sick of all the junk email I have been getting and would like to know
> > how some of you have set up email filters, particularly anyone using Eudora.
> .
> > Have any of you got it set up so you don't miss any "important" messages?
>
> Here are a few random notes:
>
> First, [log in to unmask] is still listed as the contact for LUND.COM at
> Internic. This is a *great* way to get *lots* of spam.
Works for me. My address is all over the 'net, and I (used to) get boatloads
of it. Get much less nowadays, though they keep trying! ;-)
{good ideas snipped]
> A growning Usenet practice is to use "[log in to unmask]" in your .sig
> file (and your web browser), and to add a note to you .sig file saying
> "Remove nospam from email address to write me". This defeats the
This one's a dangerous idea; alot of mail systems (like ours, and others are
starting to do this as well) allow the MTA (server) to refuse to accept any
mail that doesn't come from a valid domain. By creating a bogus host name
(using "nospam" on the right side of the "@") you'll find that you won't be
able to send messages (directly) to an ever-increasing number of hosts.
If you're gonna do this, try it on the left side of the "@" sign. Since
mailbox names *can't* be verified on the 'net in general, you'll at least
get through such filters. You'll still likely not get some replies (cause
no matter what you enter, people often reply without paying much attention
to the address; and some mailers don't even show it to you), but it MIGHT
help reduce the volume of junk mail you get.
Note; just "MIGHT" cause the address trawlers are getting smarter too; they're
learning to look for "nospam." in addresses too. So while it might help
you for a while, long term they're gonna get to ya. Clue-by-4s are by
far the best weapons! :-) Spammers are increasingly using throw-away
accounts or being constrained to the few ISPs that allow spamming --and
thankfully both are getting a LITTLE scarcer as time goes by.
In the meantime, if you get spammed (and have the time); send a complaint.
The more complaints the spammers (and their ISPs get) the faster they'll get
cut off, and the harder it'll be for them to get new accounts next time.
**BIG PS: Complain but **DON'T** bother with the spammer's "remove me from
this list" mailboxes. In many cases, they either ignore these mailboxes
altogether (they're mostly buying CDs full of addresses from someone else
these days anyway) or they're using these lists to confirm that your address
really is valid -- and you might just find yourself on several NEW lists
(as some spam-fighting testers have demonstrated repeatedly); or even
worse, find yourself the victim of a spam spoofing attack (they like to
send out e-mails using return addresses belonging to previous complainers
or others they have vendettas with; so those people get bombed by all the
complaints from their new spam).
-Chris Bartram
|
|
|