HP3000-L Archives

November 1997, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Daniel Levite <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Daniel Levite <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Nov 1997 16:28:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
ACTUALLY, the table is not too small.  we are running a listener that
launches son processes and uses about 30 jcw's for each son process.  we
are not sure how many we will need but if we try to run 100 users that
would quickly add up to around 3000 jcws per session. note: im talking
vars here not jcws. and they are named based on the pin of the son
process.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 1997 11:08 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]; Daniel Levite
> Subject:      Re: JCW limits for sessions
>
> > Date:          Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:27:15 -0500
> > Reply-to:      Daniel Levite <[log in to unmask]>
> > From:          Daniel Levite <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject:       JCW limits for sessions
> > To:            [log in to unmask]
>
> > does anyone know the limits for session JCWs and VARs?
>
> I ran an experiment:
>
> setvar i, 1
> while true do
> setvar i!i, i
> setvar i, i+1
> endwhile
>
> It took 10338 variable (with small names and integer values) to fill
> up the table (which had 161 variable (different sizes and shapes) to
> start with. That is a total of 10499 variables.
>
> I did a second experiment:
>
> setvar i, 1
> while true do
> setvar biglongname!i,
> "zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz"
> setvar i, i+1
> endwhile
>
> In this case it took only 5400 variables to fill up the table (a
> total of 5561 entires).
>
> So the bottom line as I see it is that it depends on the variables
> and values as to haow many variables will fit in one variable table.
>
>
> As the person responsible for making sure MPE/iX tables are size
> "appropriately", my question is:
>
> Why do you want to know? How many vairables/JCWs do you need per
> session? Help me understand the real impact of the table being too
> small (if any).
>
>                                  Scott McClellan
>      ___   ___   _________       Hewlett-Packard
>     /_ /| /_ /| /_______ /|      Commercial Systems Division
>    |##| | ##| ||########| |      19447 Pruneridge Ave
>    |##| |_##| ||##| |_##| |      Cupertino, CA
>    |##|/__##| ||##|/__##| |
>    |########| ||########|/       E Mail: [log in to unmask]
>    |##| | ##| ||##| |            Phone : (919) 969-7870
>    |##| | ##| ||##| |            Fax   : (919) 969-7871
>    |##| | ##|/ |##|/
>     --    --    --               Voice Mail : 447-6067

ATOM RSS1 RSS2