HP3000-L Archives

November 1997, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: To Array or not to Array
From:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Nov 1997 06:08:04 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Hi Pedro,

There is really no conflict.  Mirrored disks perform much better than disk
arrays.

Bill Lancaster

At 09:15 AM 10/31/97 -0500, Pedro Gonzalez wrote:
>We have a 987SX that is having some disk bottleneck problems.  Most of our
>disc drives are older single ended drives and we want to replace them with
>newer Fast/Wide discs and io cards and get some redundancy at the same time.
>I have heard conflicting stories on using disk Arrays Vs regular FWD drives
>that are mirrored.
>Does any have any experience in which solution is better for disc
>performance?
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2