I have to agree that NT can (under the right circumstances) work
reliably.  I have a 486/33 running NT 4.0 sp3 which handles all of
the email and DNS for the 'editcorp.com' domain. I believe the
longest stretch I've had it go was almost three months without
shutting down, but I did it only because I had some new software
to install.  I know three months isn't that big of a deal compared
to my 3000, but for a PC, I'm impressed!

Regards,
Michael L Gueterman
Easy Does It Technologies
email: [log in to unmask]
http://www.editcorp.com
voice: (888) 858-EDIT -or- (509) 943-5108
fax:   (509) 946-1170
--


----------
From:  Joe Geiser[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:  Monday, September 22, 1997 8:00 AM
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject:  Re: [HP3000-L] Re[2]: Legacy system?!

On Monday, September 22, 1997 10:41 AM, Bruce Senn
[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] wrote:

> I seem to remember the group settling on the following definition of
> legacy:
>
> Any system which has not required a restart for 30 days.

Uh Oh - better not let my friends at Microsoft hear that --- they don't
like to hear their beloved Windows NT Servers referred to as "Legacy
Systems"  <g>  (BTW:  The Gateway Server has been up for who knows how
long.)

Cheers,
Joe