Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 11 Sep 1997 08:24:33 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
After lots of discussion with Cortlandt, I think I should clarify one of
the statements I made a few days ago. Here is my original statement:
Most importantly, I feel users groups (including INTEREX) should be run
by users, not consultants or HP. (I have nothing against HP or
consultants, but I feel they should not have a dominance in running an
indpendent users group.)
As I told Cortlandt, I do not always communicate in the best way and my
meaning seems to get blurred. So let me try and clarify.
I think all members of INTEREX (HP, Vendors, Consultants, 'Users', ect.)
should have the right to serve in volunteer roles within INTEREX,
including the Board of Directors. Having said that, I also believe that
there needs to be a balance in the make-up of the leadership areas,
especially on the Board of Directors. I don't think it benefits any of
us if the Board is 100% HP, 100% Consultants or even 100% 'Users'. It is
very difficult to determine the best balance but there should be some
limitations
or guidelines put forth. I think that 'Users' should be strongly
represented on the Board and that can be in numbers or simply strong
leaders, and I feel that I can be one of those strong leaders.
I hope this helps clarify my previous statement.
--
****************************************
** **
** Chad Gilles **
** Sr. Software Analyst **
** ---------------------------------- **
** American United Life **
** One American Sq. **
** Indianapolis, IN 46206-0368 **
** ---------------------------------- **
** Ph. 317-263-1423 **
** Fx. 317-263-1956 **
** EM. [log in to unmask] **
** ---------------------------------- **
** **
** _/_/_/ _/ _/ **
** _/ _/ _/ **
** _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ **
** _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ **
**_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ **
** **
****************************************
*************************************
|
|
|