HP3000-L Archives

August 1997, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stigers, Gregory - ANDOVER" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stigers, Gregory - ANDOVER
Date:
Wed, 27 Aug 1997 13:03:09 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
We are starting to compile entire COBOL subsystems in batch. Out of say,
500 programs, we are getting maybe twenty errors, more questionables,
and a large number of warnings. I would like to produce and manage
listings to aid in finding and correcting these errors, questionables,
and warnings.

AFAIK, my choices are to send the listing to STDList, and get a FILEDES
that is the program name, or to send to a disc file. We already are
producing a very large number of STDLists, and having trouble managing
them for lack of time to look at the interesting stuff (and we already
have a third-party product in place that reads in the STDLists, so they
are no solution). I hate to add to this massive list. But disc files
have to be built, which I have already written a job to do, building
them 999,999 so the compiles don't fail just for this. But my choices
seem limited for those that I do not want to keep around. I hate to
purge and build hundreds of files with 0 ERROR(s), 0 QUESTIONABLE, 0
WARNING(s). I guess I could write a command file to grep for this
string, and when found, purge and build again. I don't think that would
be as easy with spool files.

Do I have other choices for managing compile listings? Is there a better
way than I describe to manage either of these choices? Should I just
quit whining and learn to live with it?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2