Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 2 May 1997 09:48:38 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 5/1/97 I wrote:
>Last week we had an application fail with dreaded "Broken Chain" message. To keep it
>short: it wasn't really a broken chain. With a bunch of help from Adager we found that
>there were 2,305 records missing from the dataset. Further investigation turned up
>52 blocks of hosed (technical term for set to binary zeros) records beginning on an
>even block boundary near the end of the records in the set. The suspect is DDX.
I apparently did not make it clear that I am not inferring DDX is an egg sucking dog.
We have been running DDX for over a year with no problem (other than that business
about balancing the records/blocks on the last increment) and it has been of great
convenience. Also note that DDX only a suspect not a convict, although I'd bet the
first bail of cotton this summer it did it.
Additionally, no one has contacted me with similar experiences. However I have heard
out of several (12) people who got a bit nervous over my experience (I'm not nervous
I'm just balder). Sorry for the waste of space but I wanted to clear the scene up a bit.
Regards,
Jim Trudeau *
Computer Sciences Corp *
Harlingen, Texas * This space is well, space.
*
Voice: (210) 430-7728 *
Fax: (210) 412-8531 *
e-mail [log in to unmask] *
|
|
|