Jeff Woods <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

<big snip detailing much HP silliness>

>I never will understand why this letter wasn't simply stuffed into an
>envelope (or even better, tri-folded and stapled) and mailed.  I shudder to
>think what HP spent (packaging and shipping UPS) trying to fix the original
>problem when a single piece of paper and 32 cents (or less) postage would
>have been at least as expedient.

Gee, maybe if HP took Jeff's suggestion then they'd have more cash to invest
in R&D for the HP3000....

I formally propose that HP's funding model for the 3000 should be related to
their packing and shipping practices.

 -- Evan