HP3000-L Archives

March 1997, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 5.0 Performance
From:
Alan AMBERS <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alan AMBERS <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Mar 1997 07:38:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
C6927525.txt (14 lines) 
Tracy Johnson said.

[snip]

>anyone could tell me if it's the extra drives, or 5.0 running with only
>84MB?

We found a drop in performance when we moved our machines (947, 957) to
5.0 that adding memory helped the problem.  The 957 which averages over
150 sessions had 384mb.  Now it is maxed out at 768mb.

/alan
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2