Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 3 Feb 1997 17:11:24 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Please allow me to say that I agree sufficiently with John Alleyn-Day's
posting that I think it is worth the bandwidth to repeat it in full --
although I am at a loss to imagine what "can be done about the software
pricing structure on the HP3000", which is John's final point:
> In all the discussion of tier pricing, I think a very important point has
> been missed.
>
> It is very true that ideally, the free market should produce a reasonable
> price for any individual piece of software. However, I think our unspoken
> concern is not for the competition between software packages, but the
> competition between the HP3000 and other possible systems, particularly
> networked PCs.
>
> I think our concern for the pricing of software is related to the
> competitiveness of the HP3000, and we perceive that certain members of the
> HP3000 community are extracting excessive amounts of money without regard
> for what it may do to the community as a whole. They are killing the
goose
> that lays the golden eggs (or sh...ing in their own nest, to mix a
metaphor).
>
>
> As many of the messages have pointed out, discussions of "fairness" in
> pricing have no meaning when they are applied to an individual piece of
> software or a specific transaction. The "fairness" is determined by the
> free market. But when looked at from the point of view of the HP3000
> community as a whole, the idea of fairness has an entirely different
> connotation, namely, "what effect does this have on the viablity of the
> HP3000 and on our jobs and our businesses?". The "unfairness" is not
> directed so much at the individual customer as it is at all of us who
> depend on the HP3000 for our livelihood.
>
> I don't have any answers for what can be done about it. But I do feel
> strongly that this problem needs to be addressed seriously before we see
> the HP3000 sink, weighted down by excessive software fees. In many cases,
> it may be a superior technical solution; but if some other solution is
> vastly less expensive, that other solution is the one that will succeed.
> For the well-being of all us, we need to do something about the software
> pricing structure.
>
Wirt Atmar
|
|
|