Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 24 Jan 1997 13:47:12 +0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Duane,
>My previous response was too quick to assume I was in error. Not all the
>NL intrinsics accept a calendar date as you say!
You are right Duane. I stand corrected. Thank you.
>One of them returns the calendar date (NLCONVCUSTDATE)! It is this NL
>intrinsic which now assumes that a date of 01/01/00 is in the year 2000
>instead of 1900 and will return a year of 100 instead of 0 encoded into
>the returned calendar date.
>So, I stand by my original comment:
>If you have code that wants to build a calendar date using NLCONVCUSTDATE
>you cannot do this for 1900-1949.
Small correction:
If you have code that wants to build a calendar date using NLCONVCUSTDATE
you cannot do this for *1900-1927*.
This intrinsic interprets yy/mm/dd, yy = 00-27, as CALENDAR year 100-127
(meaning 2000-2027) and 28-99 as CALENDAR year 1928-1999.
NL intrinsics accepting CALENDAR format accept year from 0 to 127 for
1900-2027.
--
Gopi ([log in to unmask])
CSY R&D India, Bangalore.
|
|
|