HP3000-L Archives

January 1997, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
[log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 9 Jan 1997 18:38:13 +0100443_us-ascii John,

in the past I was also asked to rate HP3000 system in MIPS ... but this
means MEANINGLESS INDICATOR OF PROCESSOR SPEED and is still used in the
blue world ;-)

I convinced my mgt that HP rates relational to 947 systems (these are
the factors HP communicates).

For HP9000's HP started a different way ... but the HPUX colleaguaes
already are gone today so I cannot not ask for details today. [...]52_9Jan199718:38:[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:17:22 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Re: (13 lines)
Jeff wrote:
> Please let me know your results and I'll assemble the final tallies!

Before anyone gets too excited about these "benchmark" results, I
just want to point out that Whetstone is a measure of FLOATING POINT
MATH performance, and thus is likely to be irrelevant to most 3000
applications.

It might be a good way of finding out whether the FPU in your system
actually works or not, which you might otherwise have never known :-)

G.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2