HP3000-L Archives

December 1996, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Michael D. Hensley" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 30 Dec 1996 16:29:14 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
> If there is more than one disc in <long-name> then MPE will not
> allocate more than 50% aggregate (perm+trans) of the drive capacity
> unless there is *no* suitable space on any other member volume.  You
> cannot "force" things either using volutil's allocation percentages,
> since you cannot configure anything less than 100% (perm+trans),
> e.g., you can't set limits of 80% perm/10% trans, it must be 80/20.
> This can of course lead to serious fragmentation as the drives get
> full.

Thanks!

The problem one our customers is seeing is a disc load imbalance.
He's got two discs in MPEXL_SYSTEM_VOLUME_SET, (and 20+ drives in
various user volume sets), but he's pausing for disc a lot, and the
io queue length on LDEV 2 gets pretty high.  Current theory: his
applications do a lot of spoolfile writing, and it's all happening on
LDEV 2 since MPE is studiously avoiding LDEV 1.

---
Michael D. Hensley             | [log in to unmask] (personal)
Software Development Manager   | [log in to unmask]    (business)
Lund Performance Solutions     | http://www.lund.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2