>
> I prefer the HPCCYY variable along with David. It's short and simple.
>
> My $.04 worth,
> Kimber Renk.
But, if HPCCYY = 2001, does that imply the century is 20? It isn't!
(It's 21)
In other words, it leads to incorrect interpretations of the thousands
and hundreds digits of a 4-digit year.
That's why I prefer HPYYYY ... a simple & obvious 4-digit year.
The "CCYY" always makes me stop and wonder: "what's the CC mean?"...it
just isn't common usage in English (just tested on our office manager,
who confirmed it :) (She had no idea what CCYY was, but immediately
figured out YYYY.)
--
Stan Sieler [log in to unmask]http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html